Difference between revisions of "Parallel ladder"
(Copied/adapted page from http://hexwiki.tk) |
m (corrected a parser error) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
It is possible to use this trick off from one row farther back; i.e. with ladders on [[Third row|row 3]] and [[Fifth row|5]] but this occurs far less frequently and one has to examine some additional defensive possibilities. Consider the following position. | It is possible to use this trick off from one row farther back; i.e. with ladders on [[Third row|row 3]] and [[Fifth row|5]] but this occurs far less frequently and one has to examine some additional defensive possibilities. Consider the following position. | ||
| − | <hex>R10 C10 Q1 Vd5 He5 Vd6 Ve6 Hb7 Vc7 Hd7 Hb9< | + | <hex>R10 C10 Q1 Vd5 He5 Vd6 Ve6 Hb7 Vc7 Hd7 Hb9</hex> |
Red has just played e6 trying the parallel ladder trick. With the closer ladder on [[Second row|row 2]], we saw that Blue was forced to respond with the parallel ladder play e7. But here Blue has two additional possibilities e8 and c9 (the only other possibility where Red doesn't have a way to force his group to connect to the [[Bottom edge|bottom]] is c10. But Red can respond with f8 and now Blue has nothing better than e7, g6). | Red has just played e6 trying the parallel ladder trick. With the closer ladder on [[Second row|row 2]], we saw that Blue was forced to respond with the parallel ladder play e7. But here Blue has two additional possibilities e8 and c9 (the only other possibility where Red doesn't have a way to force his group to connect to the [[Bottom edge|bottom]] is c10. But Red can respond with f8 and now Blue has nothing better than e7, g6). | ||
e8 yields a second row ladder after d8, e7, c8, c10, d9. The play c9 also leads to a second row ladder after the likely f7, f8, e8 (d9 is met by e7) d10. In the latter case, Red could again try the parallel ladder trick by playing g7. Of course, the presence of other pieces in the area can change the possibilities. | e8 yields a second row ladder after d8, e7, c8, c10, d9. The play c9 also leads to a second row ladder after the likely f7, f8, e8 (d9 is met by e7) d10. In the latter case, Red could again try the parallel ladder trick by playing g7. Of course, the presence of other pieces in the area can change the possibilities. | ||
Revision as of 23:04, 3 December 2007
A laddering situation in which the attacker can make two ladders on top of each other.
Consider the following position with Blue to play.
All of Red's pieces form a connected group. This group is connected to the top. At the bottom, Red has a second row ladder with no possible escape on the left. The potential escapes on the right are inadequate. For example, suppose Red ladders to f9. Then tries to escape with
- 5. h9 g9
- 6. h8 g8
- 7. h7 f7.
Now Red's only reasonable try is 8.g7 f8. Now 9.g6 loses to 9...f5 and 9.h5 loses to the forcing sequence 9...g6 10.h6 h4 11.g5 f5. All the other escape attempts likewise fail. Is Red done for?
No! Red can create a sufficient escape by making use of a parallel ladder. In the original position Red plays 1.e7. How can Blue stop Red from connecting to the bottom? d9 lets Red two-chain from e7 to f8 connecting to the bottom; e9 and e10 allow d9 which is connected to the bottom and threatens to connect to Red's big group through c9 and e8; d10 loses to e8, f9 (forced), c10; hence, Blue is forced to play the parallel ladder move 1...e8. It is simplest for Red to repeat this and ladder to f7 forcing the 2...f8 response.
Now Red now goes back to the second row ladder and tries to escape. What have we gained by preceding this with the parallel ladder moves? When trying to escape, the threat to connect to d7-e7-f7 is stronger than the previous weak threat to connect to d7. This extra threat will let us push our escape chain farther up the board and in this case, just far enough to win the game.
Red's winning sequence is long but rather simple because every one of Blue's replies is forced. As before, Red ladders to f9 and escapes with 7. h9. Play continues 7...g9 8.h8 g8 9.h7 g7 10.h6 g6 11.h5. Red is threatening to play g5 with the double winning threats f5 and f6. But if Blue blocks this, say with 11...g5, then Red continues 12.i3 i2 13.h3 h2 and 14.g3 completes the win.
It is possible to use this trick off from one row farther back; i.e. with ladders on row 3 and 5 but this occurs far less frequently and one has to examine some additional defensive possibilities. Consider the following position.
Red has just played e6 trying the parallel ladder trick. With the closer ladder on row 2, we saw that Blue was forced to respond with the parallel ladder play e7. But here Blue has two additional possibilities e8 and c9 (the only other possibility where Red doesn't have a way to force his group to connect to the bottom is c10. But Red can respond with f8 and now Blue has nothing better than e7, g6).
e8 yields a second row ladder after d8, e7, c8, c10, d9. The play c9 also leads to a second row ladder after the likely f7, f8, e8 (d9 is met by e7) d10. In the latter case, Red could again try the parallel ladder trick by playing g7. Of course, the presence of other pieces in the area can change the possibilities.
