Difference between revisions of "Template VI1/Intrusion on the 3rd row"
m (No time to fix but at least this is now flagged as incorrect.) |
(Fixed 3 diagrams.) |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Sa6 | Sa6 | ||
− | Bh5 | + | Bh5 Mi5 Pi4 Pj3 |
</hex> | </hex> | ||
The Red 1 hex is connected to the bottom, and threatens to connect to the top through | The Red 1 hex is connected to the bottom, and threatens to connect to the top through | ||
either one of the "+" hexes. Thus these are the only important incursions. An incursion to the right of the | either one of the "+" hexes. Thus these are the only important incursions. An incursion to the right of the | ||
− | number 1 hex is important only in connection with the two indicated here | + | number 1 hex is important only in connection with the two indicated here. We consider each of the two incursions below. |
− | below | + | |
== Third-row followup: i4 == | == Third-row followup: i4 == | ||
Line 44: | Line 43: | ||
Sa6 | Sa6 | ||
− | Bh5 | + | Bh5 Mi5 Mi4 Mk3 |
Pj4 Pl4 | Pj4 Pl4 | ||
Pj5 | Pj5 | ||
Line 195: | Line 194: | ||
Sa6 | Sa6 | ||
− | Bh5 | + | Bh5 Mi5 Mj3 |
</hex> | </hex> | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
[[category:edge templates]] | [[category:edge templates]] |
Revision as of 13:51, 8 September 2020
This article deals with a special case in defending against intrusions in template VI1, namely the intrusion on the 3rd that is not eliminated by sub-templates threats. NOTE THAT THIS PAGE IS NOT CORRECT; THE SUGGESTED MOVE FOR RED IS A LOSING MOVE AND BLUE CAN RESPOND BY PLAYING ON THE SECOND ROW DIRECTLY UNDER THE TWO STONES; THIS BREAKS THE CONNECTION.
Contents
Basic situation
Red should go here:
The Red 1 hex is connected to the bottom, and threatens to connect to the top through either one of the "+" hexes. Thus these are the only important incursions. An incursion to the right of the number 1 hex is important only in connection with the two indicated here. We consider each of the two incursions below.
Third-row followup: i4
Figuring out the Must-play region
Red threatens to play at "+" points above, with these templates:
We need only consider the intersection of these templates.